Develop Service Line Strategies
Analyze the Competitive Landscape
Anticipate Future Patient Needs
Identify Sites To Capture Demand
Drive Loyalty Across the Patient Journey
Leverage Price Transparency Insights
Retain Patients in Your Network
Match Provider Supply to Demand
Acquire Commercial Patients
Capture Outpatient Demand
Target High-Value HCPs
Strengthen Provider Networks
We collect and organize the industry’s most comprehensive healthcare datasets.
See demand, supply and yield across the U.S. health economy
Validated Data for 2.9M Practitioners
Episodes of Care for 300M Patients
Negotiated Rates for Any Service at Any Location
Flexible solutions to fit your specific needs and workflow
Free resources to help health economy stakeholders use our products and data
Answer Key Questions in Seconds
Health Economy Survival Strategies
Custom Enterprise-Level Analyses
Product Guides and Feature Releases
Inform Data-Driven Strategies
How We Tackle Technical Problems
Data-Driven Benchmarking Tool
Strategic guidance and commentary from our CEO, Hal Andrews
Annual fact-based analysis of trends shaping the health economy
An essential resource to survive healthcare’s negative-sum game
Develop Service Line Strategies
Analyze the Competitive Landscape
Anticipate Future Patient Needs
Identify Sites To Capture Demand
Drive Loyalty Across the Patient Journey
Leverage Price Transparency Insights
Retain Patients in Your Network
Match Provider Supply to Demand
Acquire Commercial Patients
Capture Outpatient Demand
Target High-Value HCPs
Strengthen Provider Networks
We collect and organize the industry’s most comprehensive healthcare datasets.
See demand, supply and yield across the U.S. health economy
Validated Data for 2.9M Practitioners
Episodes of Care for 300M Patients
Negotiated Rates for Any Service at Any Location
Flexible solutions to fit your specific needs and workflow
Answer Key Questions in Seconds
Custom Enterprise-Level Analyses
Inform Data-Driven Strategies
Free resources to help health economy stakeholders use our products and data
Health Economy Survival Strategies
Product Guides and Feature Releases
How We Tackle Technical Problems
Data-Driven Benchmarking Tool
Strategic guidance and commentary from our CEO, Hal Andrews
Annual fact-based analysis of trends shaping the health economy
An essential resource to survive healthcare’s negative-sum game
You are currently viewing the public version of Studies. To unlock the full study and additional resources, upgrade your subscription to Compass+.
September is Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, a campaign to increase public awareness about prostate cancer, which is the most common type of non-skin cancer in men in the U.S. and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men.1 The public health campaign emphasizes early detection, advancements in treatment options and emerging trends in prostate cancer prevalence, incidence and mortality.
Given its high prevalence, real-time analysis of emerging trends in prostate cancer and other types of cancers is crucial, especially as overall cancer rates are projected to rise in the coming decade.
Over the last few decades, the annual rate of incident prostate cancer declined from 169.1 per 100K population in 1999 to 116.6 per 100K population in 2019 (Figure 1).2,3 In tandem, changes in prostate cancer screening guidelines have affected the number of cases identified in the U.S.4
Recommendations have evolved in response to emerging evidence, including debates about the benefits and risks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) repeatedly issued “D” grade recommendations for PSA-based screening, concluding with moderate to high certainty that the harms of PSA screening outweighed the benefits.5,6,7,8
However, in 2018, the USPSTF updated its recommendation to a “C” grade for men ages 55 to 69, concluding that periodic PSA-based screening for prostate cancer should be an individual decision made in consultation with a healthcare provider.9 That said, the agency is currently updating its recommendation.10
Notably, rates of prostate cancer screening remain high, despite USPSTF’s “C” grade recommendation.
Despite the adjustments in screening guidelines, incidence of prostate cancer gradually declined through 2014 but has increased since then. The American Cancer Society (ACS) projects 299K new cases of prostate cancer and 35K deaths in 2024, with a 12.9% probability of dying from prostate cancer across age groups (Figure 2).
Within the male population, the rate of projected new cancers ranges from 114.9 per 100K in D.C. to 282.8 per 100K in South Dakota in 2024.
Furthermore, advancements in treatment modalities have contributed to evolving treatment patterns. Prostate cancer treatment options can include active surveillance, surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, among other treatment options.11
Proton therapy is a type of radiation therapy that uses proton beams to treat cancer, while traditional radiation therapy uses X-rays. Proton beams stop at the tumor, reducing the likelihood of damage to nearby healthy tissue.12 The costs associated with proton beam therapy are high, and clinical trial evidence about the use of proton beam radiation for prostate cancer is still being studied.13
Notably, the American Society of Radiation Oncology recommends that proton beam therapy for prostate cancer – among other cancer types – should only be covered by insurance if the patient is enrolled in a Medicare-compliant clinical trial or patient registry.14
Because of these advancements, concerns about low-value treatment and over-screening persist, emphasizing the need for balanced approaches that consider the latest technological improvements while addressing the risks of high-cost interventions for which the risks and benefits are still being defined.
Understanding how prostate cancer patient volume and treatment practices have evolved between 2017 and 2023 is crucial for improving patient outcomes and ensuring effective disease management.
Leveraging our national all-payer claims database, we analyzed male patient volumes for prostate cancer from 2017 to 2023 and stratified by four age groups: ages 18-49, 50-64, 65-79 and 80 and older.
To further characterize trends in treatment paradigms for prostate cancer, we analyzed patient volumes for proton beam therapy procedures (CPT 77520-77525).
Patient volume for prostate cancer is up 6.8% in 2023 compared to 2017 levels (Figure 3). Despite a drop in patient volume amid the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, patient volumes have consistently grown relative to 2017.
After two decades of consistent declining incidence through 2019, the disruptions to care and impacts from COVID-19 on screening, diagnosis and disease monitoring impacted the number of people being diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer.
Thanks to Colin Macon and Katie Patton for their research support.